A. Fine Blog

Allison Fine Writes About Social Media and Social Change

Do “Most People” Really Find Web 2.0 Tools Hard to Use?

Posted by Allison Fine on October 2, 2007

The Overbrook Foundation report on the readiness of their human rights grantees to fully engage in the Web 2.0 world is circulating widely. Many people have found it useful. And some less so. Jayne Cravens, shared these thoughts (in part):

“ *You* may see Web 2.0 tools as easy-to-use, but many, many people — in fact, *most* people — don’t. Just because you and, perhaps, those you associate with see these tools as simple, the majority of people and organizations do not, and if you cannot appreciate that point-of-view, you cannot help nonprofits to embrace Web 2.0.”

In the report, we defined Web 2.0 tools to mean new wireless and web-based technologies. Let’s start with wireless. Does Jayne think that using a cell phone is difficult? Is sending a text message difficult? “Most people” find cell phones easy and essential to use. This isn’t a euphemism in regards to cell phone usage and US citizens (we intentionally limited the study scope to US based organizations.) According to the Pew Center on the Internet and American Life nearly three quarters of all American adults have a cell phone. Nearly 60 percent of American adults over the age of 60 have cell phones. Thirty percent of overall users say they couldn’t live without their cell phone. Millions of them are text messaging use their cells, increasingly emailing using their more expensive smart phones and instant messaging.

How about blogs? According to Technorati, the leading blog tracking website, there are over 107 million blogs. Over 4 million bloggers update their web logs daily, or over 50,000 posts an hour. Creating a free blog on blogger.com or wordpress.com or other services takes less than five minutes to do. In my over three years of studying blogs and working with bloggers, young and old, I’ve never heard a person say that creating or updating a blog is difficult to do. Millions more set up email accounts for free in seconds, and use instant and text messaging.

Please note that I am responding to the issue of whether using Web 2.0 tools is difficult. They are not difficult or expensive to use that’s precisely why they have spread so far and wide so quickly. Where nonprofits and NGOs are struggling, is a people problem not a tech problem. Many people find it intimidating and overwhelming to try to stay on stop of all of the new tools, moreover, and here is the most critical point for activists, too many leaders of activist organizations don’t understand how they need to change the way they work to use the tools to best effect. A blog is an opportunity to create a community-wide converation about issues. Organizations that have blogs without the ability for readers to comment is a lost opportunity; a brochure not a conversation.

The activists who participated in our group discussions at the Overbrook Foundation were primarily executive directors of human rights organizations. Their dilemma was that too many of them didn’t know what they didn’t know. Consultants and other support people, like Jayne, are critically important in providing information and support to these people and organizations to help ease their transition from the old broadcast world

In summary, the tools themselves, are indeed very easy to use. The transition to a new culture of open, networked organizations is incredible difficult, particularly for organizations and individuals who were successful in the old era. But that’s a people problem not a tech challenge. And I agree with Jayne that as a community of funders and support organizations we are not doing a great job of easing that difficult transition for most groups. That was the underlying reason for doing the research for Overbrook in the first place, the very difficult struggle that organizations, and the people who run them, are having keeping up in the Connected Age.

About these ads

4 Responses to “Do “Most People” Really Find Web 2.0 Tools Hard to Use?”

  1. jcravens said

    >>Does Jayne think that using a cell phone is difficult?

    Indeed, I do! For myself and many other people, a cell phone is not intuitive and we struggle with most of the features. And it *regularly* happens that someone I know sells their most recent cell phone in order to downgrade to something more understandable (surely you have read the media articles on this phenom?)

    >>How about blogs?

    I have struggled *many* times to figure out how to comment on a blog — it is not always obvious. And for users who aren’t using the very latest operating systems and browsers, blogs can be completely inaccessible. Your own blog isn’t accessible for the browser I use to search the web, so I had to try to use another browser; then the blog login page wouldn’t recognize this brower, so I had to try a third — all in all, it made your own blog *very* difficult to use, and took more than five minutes for me to finally be able to post this comment.

    In addition to my own experience, I’ve helped many nonprofit staff members and volunteers set up or comment on blogs — they could not figure it out on their own.

    So, to myself and those people, what do you say? Rather than smirk that “it’s easy!”, why not acknowledge the difficulties many, many others may have that you don’t? Why not acknowledge that, indeed, what’s easy for you and other very tech savvy folks might not be for many others?

    Other web 2.0 tools are also difficult to use: online social networking sites, such as MySpace or FaceBook or even Flickr, are simple for one person and a total confusion for the next.

    I stand by my statement: all Web 2.0 tools are NOT very easy to use, for many people, and to say that they are easy is insulting. And if tech advocates such as Ms. Fine can’t acknowledge that this technology is, indeed, difficult for many, many people to use, then the digital divide will just keep widening.

  2. codecorps said

    I too have to side with Ms. Cravens, though possibly for different reasons.

    For people who have achieved a certain level of comfort with computers and the Internet, Web 2.0 tools are just another step. However, there are massive numbers of people who haven’t achieved that level of comfort. In some cases, they’re just not comfortable with technology. In other cases, they’ve had no compelling reason to get comfortable with computers and the Internet. In yet other cases, people just have difficulty grasping it due to a lack of innate skill in that area, just I have a lack of innate skill at golf (and baseball and softball and tennis and just about any activity that involves swinging something). Some can’t afford computers, or an Internet connection, and find using a library to be too awkward, too infrequent, or too public.

    There’s a third level of comfort needed for many Web 2.0 sites: comfort with writing. Many people aren’t comfortable with writing, particularly on a computer. Some have limited typing skills. Some aren’t fond of writing in any form. Some write, then get embarrassed when people point out flaws in their writing, and so stop writing. Writing on the Internet in many ways is on par with public speaking, and lots of people are afraid of public speaking.

    This is nothing new. Lots of people didn’t use the telephone when it came out, even after it was readily available in their area, because they weren’t comfortable with the concept or with “new-fangled gee-gaws” in general.

    There is a significant segment of the population that is comfortable with Web 2.0 — significant enough that NGOs and NPOs should certainly consider adding Web 2.0 skills and outlets to their repertoire. However, do not trivialize the effort that may be required, if the NGOs/NPOs lack staff who are ready for the Web 2.0 plunge. I can speak with some authority that several eastern Pennsylvania municipalities, for example, have their troubles with Web 1.0, let alone Web 2.0.

    Or, to illustrate it another way, I’m a two-time entrepreneur, including co-owning one of those annoying dot-coms that never amounted to much, with 20+ years of computer programming experience, plus a book and several articles and some blogs to my credit…and I’ve never sent a text message in my life, because I’ve never had the need.

  3. lauraquinn said

    I’m a little late to the comment party, but I have to say that I strongly agree with Jayne. “Most” is of course a strong word, but there is no doubt in my mind that there are a substantial number of people aren’t using web 2.0 because one of these:

    - they’re not comfortable with computers at all
    - they find the way that computers/ software work hard to grasp, and thus very hard to learn
    - they don’t enjoy learning new technology stuff

    and, most importantly:
    - they chose to do things with their time other than learn how to use yet another something else.

    Just to take it to the anecdotal level, I’ll put it out there: I’ve worked in technology full time for more than ten years, and I do find my cell phone difficult to use. I have to think to do even the basics, like look up a phone number, and I’ve struggled through the couple times in my life when I’ve sent a text message. MySpace overwhelms and confuses me – I hate it there. I spent a solid two to three minutes just now struggling to login to your site to write a comment (what the $%@& is my WordPress login and password? and then when that got me nowhere, do I have any &%$#% email address that I *haven’t* already used on a WordPress account), and almost certainly wouldn’t have done it had it not made a good story to add into my comment.

    My husband jokes that I was working in usability (a former job) because I can’t use anything, and there’s no doubt truth in that. But I can tell you from years of usability testing that I’m remotely far from the least tech savvy person out there. Nearly every technology professional dramatically underestimates how hard average people find it to figure things out. In particular, most people don’t find it fun to figure things out – they only do so if there is a very compelling reason to do so, and then try to figure them out as quickly as possible. And hate it while they’re doing it. To say this isn’t a barrier to the use of any kind of technology tool is just silly to me.

    Just look at the demand for classes in basic internet skills, Excel, etc. Is a nonprofit who doesn’t have a reasonable handle on word processing or web searching (and I’ve worked with more than one) really going to find Web 2.0 stuff easy? And is that really where we recommend they should start?

  4. gionnetto said

    There are some things that went undiscussed. One *big* thing is, diffusion of innovation. I tend to pick up on almost *any* innovation, because I am an early adopter no matter what. Therefore, it is easier for me to find new stuff to be “easy”. The fact that it is easy for ME, shouldn’t prompt me to generalize this concept to others in a normative way (ie: from “I find blogs to be easy” to “blogs are easy”). By the same token the reverse is also true, if I find cell phones not to be easy to manage, it doesn’t mean, imply or suggest that they ARE difficult. However, early adopters are only about 16% of the population, which means that most people (like Jayne wrote) will find new technology to be difficult NO MATTER WHAT.

    Second thing is, learning styles. Not everybody learns the same way. That means that there are no “easy tools” (or “difficult tools”) per se, but it depends on the match between the user and the user interface. This fit is studied by a discipline called human-computer interaction. It is a fact that open source software, stemming from the individual needs of each developer, isn’t for the most part concerned with human-computer interaction. OS is about what that particular software developer like for HIM/HERSELF to have from his/her interface, which might or might not fit with most part of the population (most frequently, it doesn’t).

    So, to get to your line of enquiry, no, there is no ground for a normative evaluation of Web 2.0 (or any other technology) to be intrinsically easy.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 71 other followers

%d bloggers like this: