A. Fine Blog

Allison Fine Writes About Social Media and Social Change

Administrative Costs Are Not Optional

Posted by Allison Fine on March 12, 2008

The panel I was on yesterday at the onPhilanthropy Summit yesterday was terrific (kudos to Tom Watson for doing a great job of facilitating a lively conversation!) Near the end of the session, Charles Best, the CEO and founder of DonorsChoose.org, mentioned that the organization provides an option for donors to support administrative costs — or not — for any project they fund. Now, taking exception with DonorsChoose is akin to criticizing Santa Claus, really it’s a lovely organization providing an easy opportunity for people anywhere and of any means to support all or part of school projects and needs like pencils, books or disposal cameras in largely low-income communities. It’s a wonderful organization that has been magnificently launched and run by Charles and his colleagues — except for the fact that they make the true cost of operating DonorsChoose optional for donors.

As Charles said on the panel yesterday, transparency and openness are critical components of relationships between causes and donors. Agreed, and his organization does a wonderful job of explaining their own operating costs. Here is a paragraph from the area on their website called “Sustaining Operations”:

The price of a student project includes an optional fulfillment fee covering the work performed by DonorsChoose.org (see Fulfilling Student Projects). After clicking to fund a project, the donor may decide not to include this fulfillment fee. By choosing to include it, donors support the necessary resources—staff time, office space, and technology—to bring their chosen projects to life.

Charles said that over 80% of donors choose to provide the fee. But, the problem I have is that it shouldn’t be optional. There has been an overreaction in the nonprofit sector to critics of overhead and administrative fees (prompted by the actions of a few bad apples with excessive fees and costs) to make it appear to donors that it doesn’t actually cost anything to make good things happen. Unless we want Charles and his colleagues to stand outside on a street corner shouting to attract donors to great school projects, they actually do need staff and offices and desks and phones and email and a website to be successful. And we need to stop apologizing for it or pretending that it’s optional. DonorsChoose can be as transparent as they are about the true cost of their services while not giving 20% of its donors the option of not fully supporting their efforts.

3 Responses to “Administrative Costs Are Not Optional”

  1. nancys60 said

    Allison, the point you make is a vital one. Put most simply — there is no art class without the school.

    I admire Donors Choose for putting the importance of admin costs out there; but do agree that those are an imperative, not an option.

    Only through integrating those in project costs — and clearly saying so — will donors learn what it really takes to make an art class available. Now that’s sustainable giving.

    Best,
    Nancy

  2. [...] Administrative Costs Are Not Optional « A. Fine Blog Allison Fine criticizes DonorsChoose for allowing donors the option to earmark part of their donation for administrative costs. I think the problem is with the general mindset around admin costs and that DonorsChoose is creatively doing their best. (tags: blog) [...]

  3. Fartrooma said

    Do natural breast enlargement pills really work? Are they safe? Do you want to increase your penis size ?
    Penis Enlargement Success is an all natural herbal supplement.Using pills your penis will be firmer and bigger.Read about this products here http://www.just4-sex.com

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>