Fundraising Using Social Media Tipping Point
Posted by Allison Fine on January 25, 2010
Blackbaud released a study last year that provided start evidence that fundraising through social media had not yet reached a maturation, much less tipping, point. The study (based on a very small sample of 24 nonprofit organizations that are significant because of their size) revealed that online giving was still just a tiny fraction of giving through direct mail and in person.
However, the earthquake in Haiti may have permanently changed sizes of the fundraising pie slices. According to a new study by the Pew Center for People and the Press, “Haiti Dominates Public’s Consciousness” (highlighted by Lucy Bernholz) 37% of giving since the earthquake in Haiti was giving online or by text message. And, we know that it hasn’t been small change, either, with the Red Cross reporting $22 million raised by text message one week after the earthquake.
So, have we reached the tipping point? I think so, but with a caveat and a caution (you didn’t think this was going to be straightforward, did you?)
Here’s the good news. It is clear that in the time of a disaster or an emergency a lot of people are ready and willing to give donations using social media. Donating by text, in particular, fits the bill perfectly. But millions of dollars have also been raised on Facebook, websites and Twitter.
But, here’s the drawback. One of the first lessons is that giving by text is easy for the donor but not so easy for the organization. It takes some time to set up the donation process with the mobile carrier (isn’t anything that involves a telecom going to be complicated somewhere along the line?) It is a cumbersome mechanism on the back end – it takes time to set up (the Red Cross that is so fortunate to have Wendy Harman on staff had already put this mechanism in place.) More disconcerting there is ordinarily a lag time between pledges made by text and the time the organization receives it because the phone bill has to be paid. The phone companies agreed to pay 80% of donations up front for Haitian relief because of the urgency of the situation. This also raises the issues of pledges made in the moment that may not be paid later by the donor, unlike giving online using a credit card or PayPal.
The other important lesson is that just because text and, say, Twitter worked under these circumstances doesn’t mean that they are appropriate for other fundraising needs and efforts.
So, the bottom line for me right now is hooray for the increased trust and facility with a variety of social media tools that people are showing right now. However, that doesn’t mean that all of these fundraising channels are going to work for every organization in every circumstance. More reason, again, for organizations to continue to experiment with the tool set and focus on building relationships through online social networks rather than just ask random people for money online — and to focus on learning what works for your organization over time.
Share this:
This entry was posted on January 25, 2010 at 11:17 am and is filed under Social Media. Tagged: Blackbaud, Lucy Bernholz, Pew Center for People and the Press, Wendy Harman. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
11 Responses to “Fundraising Using Social Media Tipping Point”
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


James said
Great post Allison!
When speaking with nonprofits about our mobile services, we always make sure that it integrates nicely into their existing strategy. Some nonprofits are seeing this as a silver bullet… which it is not. It is a tool that, if used appropriately, can be effective in various different situations.
One addition I’d like to make, however, is that setup isn’t always painful. Causecast worked with Mobile Giving Foundation to create a unique setup process that (a) makes signup far easier and faster and (b) makes the service available to nonprofits with less than $500k revenue per year.
Looking forward to more chats on twitter! http://twitter.com/jsutandyo
Allison Fine said
Thanks, James, this is very helpful to know. Just curious, how long is it from sign up to when groups can take donations via text?
James said
It’s as quick as 24hrs, but usually 2-3 days.
We made our process very easy so long as the nonprofit can provide the required documentation (i.e. – form 990). Usually the hardest part is figuring out what keyword to choose – LIFE, NEWLIFE, FORLIFE, 4LIFE, etc, etc.
Gavin said
Alison,
I’m curious how you define “social media” in all this, and how it relates to the “fund raising” being done.
Texting (SMS) never struck me as much of a social media — it pretty much fails on all the definitions I can think of, aside from being popular. It’s not very social. Is it? Admittedly, some social media things *use* sms, but that’s about it.
Maybe I am an idiot, but it strikes me that SMS is not social media by a long shot.
That said, and interestingly enough, it seems that it has as proven itself as an ubiquitous pledging, billing and collection mechanism. Who knew that the phone companies could get it together when it came to payables and receivables. Billing, IMHO, was never their strength.
Still, as you say, we await the results of the “intention to give” (aka a pledge) compared to the actual. Given the cause, of course, I am hopeful; given reality, phone companies, and the like, I’ll need convincing. I suspect we will see some problems with the whole thing. It’s not unexpected — that’s a lot of money moving very fast, a lot of emotion.
That aside, much of the “fund raising” per se, seems to have been done via pretty traditional means, including TV and some pretty concerted *free* advertizing via traditional news outlets. The news outlets were quick to provide the “Text X to Y” instructions — and, as such, the folks that got mentioned got pledges. That’s terrific, but it’s a billing system, not social media.
So, in my mind, what has really changed is the pledge, payment, and collection process – it’s moved to SMS, and is now run through the cellular companies. Tipping point? Social Media? Unless I saw data that said that most people heard about, and responded to, “give” requests that came via Facebook, or Twitter, or the like, I remain unconvinced that social media has “changed the size of the pie or shape of the pieces.” Moreover, disaster giving is, by definition, untypical. Tell me I’m wrong, but to me, fund raising is not the billing and payment process alone, it’s what drives people to that process.
Allison Fine said
I would never say that you’re an idiot, Gavin, I’ll leave that to others.
However, I completely disagree about SMS and social media. It may not have the group interaction that other tools have, however, it has enough of the characteristics that make up the heart of social media, specifically it is cheap, mobile, ubiquitous (especially that one!) and enables large numbers of people to connect with one another, that I think it qualifies as “social.”
That said, I absolutely agree on the limitations of text as a fundraising tool as you outline above and caution about its shiny newness – the next new, new thing – for nonprofits to focus on rather than focus on relationship building.
Thanks for your interesting and provocative thoughts!
AF
AwarenessHomeFunding said
Thanks for the tips and ideas. It just reminds us to know who you are donating through. The more transparent, the better.
Deborah de Castro said
I feel that txt funding did well due to it being at the donors control, literally,finger tips. They also gave anonymous and it made them feel as if they were participating without the guilty feeling of “having to give more than they could afford”. No matter how little they gave, it was rewarding to know that they participated in a gigantic effort.
I agree that TXT is not a social media, but it has become a tool of power of spreading the word, the future of fundraising. Myself, I am one of these drivers introducing a tool called SaveNDonate….helping the donors not to have to dig deeper into their pockets to be able to send money towards their chosen charity. And Foundations adding to their bottom line a new stream of income without major efforts. Visit the site and watch the video (www.savendonate.com/raisefunds). What I am finding is that the Foundations themselfs are stuck in the old ways of raising funds and not seeing the opportunity of this new erra, the hidden treasures in Cyber World…
Mark Clayson said
i think the way to make charity by SMS is not useful itself.
Fundraising Using Social Media Tipping Point « Causecast Nonprofit said
[...] Read the rest at A. Fine Blog. [...]
Resource Roundup 2/26 « The Paul Clarke Nonprofit Resource Center Blog said
[...] Fine of A. Fine Blog’s post, “Fundraising Using Social Media Tipping Point.” Fines notes recent online giving success for disaster relief in Haiti but adds caveats in [...]
childrens care said
children…
Fundraising Using Social Media Tipping Point « A. Fine Blog…