A. Fine Blog

Allison Fine Writes About Social Media and Social Change

Posts Tagged ‘Lucy Bernholz’

The Unthinkable Power of Conversation

Posted by Allison Fine on June 1, 2009

Lucy pointed me to this great post on Change.org about Tori Hogan’s video series called Beyond Good Intentions. Tori takes a hard look at conventional wisdom in activism. Her latest video questions the efficacy of microfinance, a sacred cow in social change and philanthropic sectors. Here is how Tori explains her trepidation about stepping into taking on the iconography of microfinance as the unquestioned antidote to poverty worldwide:

I was a little bit nervous for Episode 9 (and this blog entry) to come out because I am well-aware that I am questioning a beloved organization and a highly popular development initiative. However, I feel that I need to be honest about what I witnessed in the field and, most importantly, I need to encourage a meaningful dialogue about the realities of micro-lending. After witnessing micro-lending programs on three different continents, I came to the conclusion that in most cases the poor don’t need loans, they need jobs. From what I saw, micro-lending isn’t pulling the poorest of the poor out of poverty.

Sacred cows exist everywhere.  Until recently General Motors is sustainable and newspapers aren’t dying. Sacred cows become ossified truths, untouchable, unapproachable, and unpopular to unmask. As Clay Shirky wrote, “When reality is labeled unthinkable, it creates a kind of sickness in an industry.”

Unthinkable things aren’t talked about, it’s just too scary or radical to question issues and subjects that have become sacrosanct. Unapproachable, off limits issues can’t be changed because we refuse to talk about it. It will be interesting to see what kind of reception Tori’s doubt’s about microfinance has; will it be ignored and ridiculed as naive and superficial (the easiest way to dismiss dissent) or will people open and honestly engage her in discussions about where and how microfinance works and where and how it doesn’t.

I’ve been thinking about conversation lately. Making it a noun, like the way that search became a noun a few years ago. Conversation is the natural, driving force of social change. In order for change to happen, people need to talk about it first. In safe places, with their girlfriends and daughters and co-workers. And social media makes this easier.  You can plug into conversations on lots of different platforms and channels; on Facebook, blogs, Twitter, and, of course, by email. Social media speeds up the conversations and allows more people to participate and shape them. These conversations are how we learn to embrace unthinkable things.

But, too often, we think of the unthinkable in only tragic terms; as people or industries dying. Let’s flip it over to a more positive place; after all, a black man is president and gay people can get married in Iowa!

What if we thought the unthinkable about the Supreme Court. In a country where the majority of law school graduates are women, why not a court that is majority female?

What if we thought the unthinkable about education and had the collective courage to believe that critical thinking is more important to children’s and the country’s future than test scores? And what would happen if we built a world-class education system around that idea?

What if we thought the unthinkable about program evaluation and had the courage to say that social science constructs are simply a bad fit for managing social change organizations? That the outcomes evaluation push of the last decade has been a dismal failure, is undoable and has had no effect on the efforts of social change organization? What if we had a conversation about a more natural, intuitive way of learning in real-time for activists instead? (More on this to come soon.)

Who would be willing to have these conversations? Unless and until we are, the problems they represent won’t change.

What are you afraid to think about?  How would you work and your world be different if you could bring yourself to think about it?

Posted in Social Media | Tagged: , , | 6 Comments »

The Arts and Social Capital (cont’d)

Posted by Allison Fine on March 20, 2009

I am so grateful to all of the interesting feedback and comments and tweets and emails I received yesterday regarding the post on the loss social capital in communities across the country when arts and news organizations fold.

Wrestling with the loss of news organizations has become well worn ground for bloggers, tweeters and others, but I was very interested in some of the feedback I heard regarding arts organizations that I wanted to share.

First, the good news.  I received an email from Barbara Schaeffer Bacon of Americans for the Arts, the same org that is predicting a loss of 10% of the total number of arts organizations across the country this year.  Barbara wrote in her email (and subsequently posted as a comment):

But there are promising new models.  I look to many exemplary small and medium sized cultural organizations that foster excellence in artistic production and presentation but do so closer to the ground in small towns and urban neighborhoods around the country.  Diaspora Vibe in Miami, Wing Luke Asian Museum in Seattle and Cornerstone Theater in LA are three examples. They promote art, artists and cultural expression as a catalyst for engagement around civic, social and community issues.  They demonstrate resourceful leadership and many have successfully encoded true diversity into their core values, mission and practice.  Unfortunately, these organizations are creating social and creative capital but come to this downturn undercapitalized themselves.

I also learned about a very interesting initiative spearheaded by the Nonprofit Finance Fund called Leading for the Future: Innovative Support for Artistic Excellence to support and strengthen arts organizations over a five year period. The lessons that they learn about how to structure, stabilize and grow arts organizations, presumably (hopefully!) using social media, will be important to watch.

And finally, on a philosophical note, the brilliant Lucy Bernholz was thoughtful and thought provoking as she is in every conversation with this comment:

Don’t get me wrong – I love art and art orgs – but I worry less about them, and maybe not from a rational stance. The arts are, I think, proof that some things come back stronger the harder they get whacked. The arts always get whacked when economies tank. This doesn’t make it OK and don’t take me for a art-hating hard-heart, (I think I’m just the opposite). I just feel like we’ve seen this moment before, new structural types will emerge, and the arts will thrive again in some way we could never have planned. I think of artists like water – water always finds the lowest point and artists always find the highest ground.

I sure hope Lucy is right! Perhaps Barbara is seeing a glimmer of these new signs of hope. The key question is how sustain arts organizations that have relied for so long, centuries really, on a few large patrons. Maybe another way to put the question is: What is the “iTunes” model for living performing arts?

Lots of interesting questions, and, hopefully, lots of interesting answers soon.

Posted in Social Media | Tagged: , , | 1 Comment »

I “Rock” Says Fast Co. Mag

Posted by Allison Fine on January 22, 2009

3208325632_8a57ce4999_oFast Company Magazine lists “Women in Nonprofit Technology Who Rock” (reprinted from Beth’s Blog) in which I’m listed as a “Big Picture Thinker”.  Cool!

It’s an awesome list, if I do say so myself!, that includes my co-conspirator on the GiveList Marnie Webb, Amy Sample Ward, Katrin Verclas, Lucy Bernholz and the Case Foundation bloggers Kari Dunn Saratovsky, Sokunthea Sa Chhabra, and Megan Stohner.

Just a few years ago, it would have been difficult to compile such a robust list of women who are thinkers, doers, strategizers. And now look at us.  Rock on, women!

Posted in Social Media | Tagged: , , , , , , | 2 Comments »

2nd Social Good Podcast is Posted

Posted by Allison Fine on January 9, 2009

The second edition of the Social Good podcast that I host for the Chronicle of Philanthropy has just been posted.

The topic this month is whether and how the nonprofits and foundations can take advantage of social capital in light of our reduced financial capital.  Lucy Bernholz and Katya Andresen are my guests and they’re just terrific, smart, straightforward and helpful.

There are also some useful resources up on the Chronicles website, too.  Let me know what you think about this topic and the podcast in general. Enjoy!

Posted in Social Media | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Bernholz on Marketplace

Posted by Allison Fine on December 11, 2008

Lucy Bernholz, the author of the amazing blog Philanthropy 2173 (go there to find out what it means) was on the NPR show Marketplace giving her unparalleled, big picture views of the field of philanthropy.

There are some people who follow philanthropy, but there are only a few, led I think by Lucy, who understand it well enough, from top to bottom, online and on land, to tell us what it all means.  You can see her philanthropy buzzwords here and her predicted philanthropic trends here — and listen to her on Marketplace here.

Posted in Social Media | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

The GiveList is Launched!

Posted by Allison Fine on December 3, 2008

The GiveList was launched yesterday as a resource for supporting causes in a year when many of us won’t have the means to write a check (although if you do have the means, please do so!)

The site is a really simple way to aggregate great, creative ideas for supporting causes. Just use the tag #givelist on Twitter or de.licio.ous for ideas on ways to give and support communities and causes and they’ll pop up on the site. Of you can post a comment on the site of a great idea that you have.

The most creative ways of supporting causes without have to spend, buy or donate any  money  (as determined by, well, me!) will be listed under the favorites category. So, start thinking and pinging and tagging!

The idea for the GiveList began to crystallize when my colleagues and I at the Case Foundation began to think about reviewing last year’s Guide to Good Giving for this holiday season’s giving. But, sadly for the world, this year feels very different from last year.  We began to think about providing more alternatives for people to support causes in a really tough economy.

In partnership with my friend, Marnie Webb, the co-CEO of TechSoup Global (really, global!), we did what good Social Citizens do — we put up a WordPress blog overnight, started to populate it with the tag givelist, and away we went.

As I posted on the site last night – wow, what an immediate response!  Here’s more from that post:

In the few hours that GiveList has been up and running, we are delighted and thrilled with the enthusiasm and excitement with which our idea has been received.  Thanks to Beth Kanter for so creatively adding GiveList to an upcoming presentation in Boston, and Lucy Bernholz

for posting about it so quickly.  Thanks to the tens of tweeters using the #givelist hashtag and sharing ideas and helping to spread the word.  Here’s my favorite tweet of the day from Missashe, “swoon #givelist (Hat tip, everyone I follow on twitter…) love, love, love this idea!”

So, thanks again for giving our idea oxygen and love, as someone said to us this afternoon, Just because I’m poor doesn’t mean that I have to be stingy!”

I’ll provide updates here on the great ideas we’re receiving, but, please help spread the word and put on your thinking cap ’cause it’s going to take a lot of creativity and elbow grease to help our causes and communities through the winter.

Posted in Social Media | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

GiveWell Behaving Badly

Posted by Allison Fine on January 10, 2008

Oh, to be anointed and dethroned in such quick order!

On December 19th, the New York Times gushingly, glowingly lauded the efforts of two young “hedge fund veterans” (can you really be 26 and a business veteran?) who created GiveWell a grantmaking organization with an interesting premise. GiveWell is intended to do two things fundamentally different, hopefully better, than has been done in philanthropy before: 1) to be transparent about why it has chosen certain causes to give to, and 2) to share these criteria with other potential funders. Their intention was to go beyond 990s and other financial metrics and get to the heart of results in certain, specific issue areas. Admirable, if a bit exhausting for the potential grantees. But, if it were to take off, the advantage to selected nonprofits who wouldn’t have to go through due diligence one funder at a time was clear. I was not familiar with the organization until the article in the Times, although I have to admit that my first reaction was, “Holy cow these guys are self-righteous and heavy handed!” As only twenty-somethings can be, they had it all figured out, of course we can bring transparency to philanthropy and then we’ll go viral and be the Facebook of philanthropy! But then hubris raised it’s ugly head.

It turns out that the CEO, Holden Karnofsky, was caught in the act of astroturfing, pretending to be a user to promote GiveWell’s services. He posted a heartfelt apology on his blog here. The board decided this week to demote Karnofsky from CEO to program officer and require he complete a training program.

The crime of the century? No. It’s not like he was raising money for his family in Nigeria that needs TO GET OUT RIGHT NOW OR RISK GREAT HARM TO THEIR CHILDREN. And certainly there are a host of other CEOs of businesses, such as Whole Foods, who have been caught red handed doing the same thing and recovered. But this is different for several reasons:

1. Trust and transparency are at the heart of GiveWell’s mission. Karnofsky laid waste to both with his actions.

2. Nonprofits should be held to the highest possible ethical standards, particularly for causes like GiveWell that portend to advise others, since the very existence as tax exempt entities rests on our public purpose and trustworthiness.

Lucy Bernholz, a board member of GiveWell, was her typically smart, pithy, transparent self in writing about the incident on her blog and asking readers what actions the organizations should take in light of Karnofsky’s transgression. I don’t envy Lucy’s position but I do disagree with the board’s ultimate decision to demote Karnofsky and send him to training. I think that a breach of public trust of this magnitude for an organization with transparency and accountability at its core is irredeemable. I can certainly understand that the board was facing a repentant young man who genuinely wants to make the world a better place to live, but our community has to have the very ethical highest standards, not Wall Street or even Main Street standards, but the highest possible standards that put our efforts above reproach — because our trustworthiness is our greatest asset, but once squandered, is almost impossible to recover. If your organization doesn’t have written ethical standards get them, now, today from Board Source or your local nonprofit support organization or National Council of Nonprofit Agency( NCNA) member. Really, download them now, right now, there is no excuse for not having written policies regarding ethical behavior for your organization, and intentionally misleading readers, donors, bloggers, funders, whether online or on land, is an unacceptable, fire-able offense whether you’re the CEO or a summer intern.

For more years than I’d like to admit, I have been calling on nonprofit organizations to become self-determining and proactive about self-assessment. I have pleaded with organizations to raise their ethical standards, measure their own results in rigorous and thoughtful ways before the regulators, watchdogs and hand wringers do it for us. We have largely failed to do this, to take self-assessment seriously enough, to measure our results rigorously and energetically enough, to punish our own transgressors quickly and strongly enough.

As a startup, GiveWell will be hardpressed to survive this imbroglio, and frankly, I’m not sure that they should survive. Transparent philanthropy’s time has come, whether GiveWell survives or not.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | 2 Comments »